Freedom of choice and perception of high level of corruption in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/cl.v1i34.8142Keywords:
freedom of choice, perception of corruption, political freedom, economic freedom, BrazilAbstract
The study analyzes the relationship between freedom of choice and the perception of high levels of corruption in Brazil, based on data from the 2018 World Values Survey. The objective is to understand how the sense of freedom of choice, considering its political and economic dimensions, is associated with how individuals perceive corruption. Microdata containing socioeconomic, demographic, and perceptual information were used to estimate a Probit model. The results reveal a positive association between perceived freedom and a high perception of corruption, suggesting that greater autonomy and critical awareness enhance the ability to identify unethical or illicit practices. This evidence highlights the role of freedom as a catalyst for social vigilance and the demand for public integrity. The study underscores the relevance of policies that strengthen transparency, institutions, and the reduction of regional and social inequalities.References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown.
Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 90(1), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.194
Aidt, T. S. (2009). Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp012
Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00007
Asomah, J. Y., Dim, E. E., Li, Y., & Cheng, H. (2023). What factors are associated with public corruption perception? Evidence from Canada. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2023-0078 Basel Institute on Governance
Billger, S. M., & Goel, R. K. (2009). Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption? Cross-country quantile regression estimates. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.07.006 IDEAS/RePEc
Canache, D., & Allison, M. E. (2005). Perceptions of political corruption in Latin American democracies. Latin American Politics and Society, 47(3), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2005.tb00320.x Wiley Online Library
Chafuen, A. A., & Guzmán, E. (2000). Economic freedom and corruption. In G. P. O’Driscoll, K. R. Holmes, & M. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), Index of Economic Freedom (pp. 51–63). The Heritage Foundation.
Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: An empirical test. Economics Letters, 85(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.03.024
Couto, C. G., & Arantes, R. B. (2009). A institucionalização das políticas de accountability no Brasil: Avanços e desafios. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 24(69), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092009000200003
Daniel, M., Fritz, K. B. B., & Fritz Filho, L. F. (2018). Os processos de corrupção no Brasil e a importância da ampliação das liberdades individuais para o fortalecimento da democracia. Revista Direitos Sociais e Políticas Públicas, 6(2), 306–337.
Dridi, M. (2014). Corruption and education: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(3), 476–493.
Ferraz, C., Finan, F., & Moreira, D. B. (2008). Corrupção, má gestão e desempenho educacional: Evidências a partir da fiscalização dos municípios. ANPEC – Área 11: Economia Social e Demografia Econômica.
Ferreira, A. B., & Borges, A. (2016). Corrupção, mídia e opinião pública no Brasil: Uma análise dos efeitos da exposição a escândalos políticos. Opinião Pública, 22(3), 568–598. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912016223568
Filgueiras, F. (2009). A tolerância à corrupção no Brasil: Uma antinomia entre normas morais e prática social. Opinião Pública, 15(2), 386–421. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762009000200005 SciELO
Freedom House. (2023). Brazil: Freedom in the World 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/country/brazil/freedom-world/2023 Freedom House
Geddes, B., & Ribeiro Neto, A. (1992). Institutional sources of corruption in Brazil. Third World Quarterly, 13(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599208420302 Taylor & Francis Online
Godinez, J. R., & Liu, L. (2015). Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin America. International Business Review, 24(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.05.006
Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2005). Economic freedom versus political freedom: Cross-country influences on corruption. Australian Economic Papers, 44(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2005.00253.x
Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2010). Causes of corruption: History, geography and government. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.05.004 IDEAS/RePEc
Graeff, P., & Mehlkop, G. (2003). The impact of economic freedom on corruption: Different patterns for rich and poor countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00015-6
Hasenbalg, C. (2005). Discriminação e desigualdades raciais no Brasil. Graal.
Husted, B. (1999). Wealth, culture and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490073
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001258
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492617
McMann, K., Pemstein, D., Seim, B., Teorell, J., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). Explaining differing perceptions of corruption: Evidence from public opinion surveys worldwide. World Development, 135, 105118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105118
Melgar, N., Rossi, M., & Smith, T. W. (2010). The perception of corruption. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp058
Paldam, M. (2002). The cross-country pattern of corruption: Economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00078-2
Rock, M. T. (2009). Corruption and democracy. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380802468579
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175098
Saha, S., & Su, J.-J. (2012). Investigating the interaction effect of democracy and economic freedom on corruption: A cross-country quantile regression analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 42(3), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(12)50036-6 IDEAS/RePEc
Seligson, M. A. (2006). The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: Survey evidence from Latin America. World Development, 34(2), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(05)00168-3
Shleifer, A. (1997). Government in transition. European Economic Review, 41(3–5), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00011-1
Silva, T. R., & Barreto, A. S. (2020). A percepção da corrupção nas regiões brasileiras: Uma análise regionalizada a partir da PNAD. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(2), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190180
Smith, A. (1983). A riqueza das nações (L. J. Baraúna, Trad.). Abril Cultural. (Obra original publicada em 1776)
Sung, H.-E. (2004). Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000012324.74861.9b
Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. IMF Staff Papers, 45(4), 559–594. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867585
Telles, E. (2003). Racismo à brasileira: Uma nova perspectiva sociológica. Relume-Dumará.
Transparency International. (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2018 (Executive summary PDF: https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2018_CPI_Executive_Summary.pdf) Transparency.org+1
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
World Bank. (2020). Enhancing Government Effectiveness and Transparency: The Fight Against Corruption. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/publication/enhancing-government-effectiveness-and-transparency-the-fight-against-corruption (PDF: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/235541600116631094/pdf/Enhancing-Government-Effectiveness-and-Transparency-The-Fight-Against-Corruption.pdf) Banco Mundial+1
World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/85b1c626-91c8-5a31-a82b-e24bb4c981f0 Banco Mundial de Conhecimento Aberto
World Values Survey Association. (2024). WVS Wave 7 (2017–2022): Documentation & Data. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp World Values Survey
Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. Cambridge University Press.
Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2010). Agency, values, and well-being: A human development model. Social Indicators Research, 97(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9557-z
Zechmeister, E. J., & Zizumbo-Colunga, D. (2013). The varying political toll of concerns about corruption in good versus bad economic times. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1243–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012472468
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Los autores que publiquen en Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial, el cual será cedido a la Universidad de Guadalajara para su difusión en acceso abierto.
Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas no realiza cargos a los autores por enviar y procesar artículos para su publicación.
Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales, independientes y adicionales, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas por ejemplo, incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o darlo a conocer en otros medios en papel o electrónicos, siempre que indique clara y explícitamente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas
Para todo lo anterior, los autores deben remitir el formato de carta-cesión de la propiedad de los derechos de la publicación debidamente llenado y firmado por los autores cuando el artículo ha sido aceptado para publicación. Este formato debe ser solicitado al correo electrónico contexlatin@gmail.com, y debe ser adjuntado en archivo PDF paralelamente a la aprobación de la obra.
Los lectores/usuarios de Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas pueden acceder directamente al contenido de manera libre y gratuita al momento que un nuevo número es colocado en la plataforma. Se permite al lector/usuario citar, compartir (electrónicamente y de manera física), imprimir y distribuir el material siempre que se indique de manera clara y explícitamente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas. Es necesario citar de manera correcta el trabajo y no debe de ser utilizado con fines de lucro.
