This is an outdated version published on 2024-07-01. Read the most recent version.

The Shadow of Dishonesty: Investigating the Commercialization of Academic Work on Instagram

Authors

  • Theodora Lucas Holz FURG
  • Errol Fernando Zepka Junior FURG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/cl.v2i31.8061

Keywords:

authorship, ghostwriting, ethics-writers

Abstract

The article analyzes the comprehensive and multifaceted discussion about authorship in academic works, showing that authors are not restricted to the final writing, but include those who contribute at different stages of the process. Author definitions and related ethical issues are explored, such as ghostwriting, where writers are hired to produce work on behalf of others. In addition, professional codes of ethics and examples of common infractions are discussed. A review of the literature reveals questionable practices, including the production of academic works to order. The study method involves bibliographical research and documentary analysis, adopting a qualitative approach. The research was carried out via Instagram, investigating profiles that sell academic work. The results highlight a series of illegal and unethical practices among the companies investigated, which exploit students' vulnerability and compromise academic integrity. Final considerations highlight the urgent need for measures to combat such practices, aiming to protect the integrity and value of education and research. In summary, the article emphasizes the importance of promoting transparency and responsibility in the authorship of academic works, aiming to preserve the integrity of the educational and scientific process.

Author Biographies

Theodora Lucas Holz, FURG

Bacharela em Administração pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG).

Errol Fernando Zepka Junior, FURG

Mestre em Administração (FURG); MBA em Gestão estratégica de Negócios (Unopar); Aperfeiçoado em Tecnologias na Educação (IFMG); Aperfeiçoado em Como ensinar a distância (Uniasselvi), Bacharel em Administração (FURG

References

da Cunha, M. B., & de Oliveira Cavalcanti, C. R. (2008). Dicionário de biblioteconomia e arquivologia. Briquet de Lemos Livros.

Flick, U. (2008). Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa-3. Artmed editora.

Garcia, C. C., Martrucelli, C. R. N., Rossilho, M. D. M. F., & Denardin, O. V. P. (2010). Autoria em artigos científicos: os novos desafios. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 25, 559-567.

Gil, A.. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2016.

Grieger, M. C. A. (2007). Escritores-fantasma e comércio de trabalhos científicos na internet: a ciência em risco. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 53, 247-251.

Lakatos, E; Marconi, M.. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003.

Spinak, E. Ética editorial – "Ghostwriting" é uma prática insalubre. Revista HCSM (História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos), Rio de Janeiro, v. 21, n. 2, p. 697-701, abr./jun. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.revistahcsm.coc.fiocruz.br/etica-editorial-ghostwriting-e-uma-pratica-insalubre/. Acesso em: 06 mar. 2024.

Spinak, E. Ética editorial – 'Ghostwriting' é uma prática insalubre. SciELO em Perspectiva, [S.l.], 16 jan. 2014. Disponível em: https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2014/01/16/etica-editorial-ghostwriting-e-uma-pratica-insalubre/. Acesso em: 06 mar. 2024.

Vergara, S. C. (2006). Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas, 34, 38.

Witter, G. P. (2010). Ética e autoria na produção textual científica. Informação & informação, 15(1esp), 131-144.

Published

2024-07-01

Versions